Published September 9, 2011 in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness‘ 911 issue, an article entitled, Building Evidence for Legal Decision Making in Real Time: Legal Triage in Public Health Emergencies details Decision Theater’s work in legal preparedness.
For more than a decade, national, state, and local practitioners and policy makers have echoed the importance of legal preparedness as a component of public health emergency responses and planning. With the support of the Robert Wood Johnson Public Health Law Research Program, ASU researchers, James G. Hodge Jr, JD, LLM; Timothy Lant, PhD; Jalayne Arias, JD; and Megan Jehn, PhD, MHS, developed an exercise that combines legal and ethical theory and practice with decision making science to explore how decision makers use law in public health emergencies to advance critical public health objectives. Using state-of-the-art technology at Arizona State University’s (ASU’s) Decision Theater, we designed and ran a unique tabletop exercise with an expert group of public health lawyers and ethicists focusing on legal and ethical issues arising during a pandemic influenza scenario. Combining theories of decision science within a real-time simulation exercise, we sought to understand better how legal and ethical actors absorb, address, and use information and principles of law and ethics to make real time choices when facing political, epidemiological, and other obstacles. Assessing these types of critical choices in simulation events may ultimately assist practitioners in their efforts to wield law and ethics effectively to prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality in future public health emergencies.
To read the full .pdf article, please click: Building Evidence -Legal Triage